|
NEW Music Software Discussion & Help Forums
Now with Private Messaging, Profiles, Avatars, Better Searching & Much More! |
![]() |
| The World's Biggest Music Software Site |
|
| Re: Reason CPU Monster - false title, how pathetic |
Posted by Christian Storgaard / Cybolic / SLOW PACE ADJUSTMENT (from: 80.208.6.44) on March 06, 2003 at 06:00:45:
In Reply to: Re: Reason CPU Monster posted by Listen Up!!! on July 05, 2001 at 00:50:48:
"I guess you can expect that much from someone using an SB live card for audio recording. Good luck with that."
What's a matter whith recording in your home? If your going to distort you guitar or whatever anyways, it doesn't matter. And bad sound quality doesn't equal bad music. How can anyone be so stupid?
"It takes real audio and MIDI gear to attain the sounds and control you really need to make REAL music."
Oh, and what is REAL music then? Can REAL music only be conducted with an orchestra? What's your point?
It's 16bit. The quality of a cd, yes. But music doesn't start at 16 bits. When Reason becomes 32bit, 96K, then come and see me.
Well, Reason was made for the home-musician, home-musicians produce music for CD's (who doesn't? (I know, soundtrack-makers, but they are not the target audience)), and CD's are 16bit.
"And although I do use a PC, you all must know though things are changing, the fact remains that Mac' are still the industry standard(not including IMac')."
If you could get your head out of your ass, you would know that reason is also available for MacOS 9 and MacOSX.
"A 1GHz G4 Dual processor hooked-up to Pro Tools Rig is unmatchable to any other Digital Audio Workstation."
Reason is not a DAW.
"And I have to ask you this. After you have seen music created like this how much do you appreciate electronica now. I can tell you that if you venture into real recording and programming you will learn the greatest respect for how they do it."
I have worked in a professional recording studio for two years, and I know the systems, and have the 'greatest respect for how they do it', but it's not the only way of working. I still appreciate electronica, The Beatles aren't crap just because they didn't use 128bit digital recording.
You have to realize that reason is not for the technician, it's for the musician, and when he/she has done his/her work in reason, the technician (or the musician) can take the produced audio and tweak it in something like ProTools, running different channels through good old analog effect-machines. One program does not exclude the other.
We are you from? What experience do you have making music? What right do you have to piss on a perfectly good program? And why did you write a quarter of a page about a program you apparently doesn't give a shit about?