Re: RBF sucks

let's make some comparisons:

Here is what each competing software features:

01-Basic Sequencing
MED-Yes
RENOISE-Yes

02-Sample List Editors
MED-Yes
RENOISE-Yes

03-Envelope Editors for effects
MED-No
RENOISE-Yes

04-VST Support
MED-No
RENOISE-Yes

05-Built-In Effects for each track (EQ,Reverb,etc)
MED-No
RENOISE-Yes

06-Reliable MIDI Interface
MED-No
RENOISE-Yes

07-Click Removal upon sample trigger
MED-No
RENOISE-Yes

08-One-click preview of samples in sample editors
MED-No
RENOISE-Yes

09-Automatic save feature of song upon computer
crash
MED-No
RENOISE-Yes

10-MS-DOS *and* Windows compatibility
MED-No
RENOISE-Yes

11-Auto-save feature every x amount of minutes
MED-No
RENOISE-Yes

12-Unlimited amount of audio tracks
MED-No
RENOISE-Yes

13-Unlimited amount of sample slots
MED-No
RENOISE-Yes

14-Meter displaying how much CPU power is
being used at all times during editing and
playback
MED-No
RENOISE-Yes

15-Master track allowing effects to be applied to
all tracks at once (final mastering)
MED-No
RENOISE-Yes

Costs:

MED 1.5 - $25 U.S. Funds
RENOISE - Free

You do the math.

Ray- give us all one- just one - good reason why someone who's just starting out would purchase MED instead of downloading RENOISE for free.

Just one.

Oh and by the way, the link to this page has been advertised in every popular tracker message forum for those to come and decide for themselves which software they'd prefer to use.

Thanks!