NEW Music Software Discussion & Help Forums Now with Private Messaging, Profiles, Avatars, Better Searching & Much More!

The World's Biggest Music Software Site

Home | Site Map | News | Search | What's New? | Discussion | Add Listing | Advertising

Below is one of thousands of messages contained in our Music Software Discussion & Help Forum

Yes and Yes again Posted by steve (from: 213.123.41.54) on September 30, 2000 at 17:30:23: In Reply to: are wave files good enough for professional sound posted by morgan on September 30, 2000 at 08:46:47: Yes the full fruity (TS404) is well worth the money for the program itself and when compared to the price companies like Cubase charge for their products. Morgan .wav files are essentially CD quality samples so there really is no improving on a .wav file. Music is recorded either with audio (.wavs) or MIDI or even both together. Midi can sound good so long as you have a top quality sound card. But all pro records are usually made of .wavs. For best results you would get well recorded .wav samples from a CD or make your own from synths etc. You would record real instruments + voice in .wav format too. As SteveR says there are ways of improving the quality of the standard .wav file. They are usually 16 bit and 4400Khz or something. You can increase these rates in most programs but disk space + processor usage are increased. As I say though standard rates match exactly CD quality. If you like fruity I'd say get it you may also want a sequencer to put fruity tracks into and add vocals alongside? Data Beckers Music Centre Pro is an excellent budget one. steve PS there is a fruityloops discussion page on this site http://www.hitsquad.com/smm/programs/FruityLoops_win95/ Follow Ups: Post a Followup Name: E-Mail: Subject: Comments: : Yes the full fruity (TS404) is well worth the money for the program itself and when compared to the price companies like Cubase charge for their products. : Morgan .wav files are essentially CD quality samples so there really is no improving on a .wav file. Music is recorded either with audio (.wavs) or MIDI or even both together. Midi can sound good so long as you have a top quality sound card. But all pro records are usually made of .wavs. For best results you would get well recorded .wav samples from a CD or make your own from synths etc. You would record real instruments + voice in .wav format too. As SteveR says there are ways of improving the quality of the standard .wav file. They are usually 16 bit and 4400Khz or something. You can increase these rates in most programs but disk space + processor usage are increased. As I say though standard rates match exactly CD quality. : If you like fruity I'd say get it you may also want a sequencer to put fruity tracks into and add vocals alongside? Data Beckers Music Centre Pro is an excellent budget one. : steve : PS there is a fruityloops discussion page on this site http://www.hitsquad.com/smm/programs/FruityLoops_win95/ Optional Link URL: Link Title: Optional Image URL: [ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Music Software Discussion & Help Page ] [ FAQ ]

Shareware Music Machine Is Proudly Sponsored by MUSIC SOFTWARE Windows 95 to XP  Windows 3.1  Macintosh  BeOS  Linux  OS/2  DOS  Atari  RESOURCES Competitions-Prizes  Tutorials & Advice  Discussion Forum  Reference Books  Free Content For Webmasters  Free Banners  News Archive  Search  COMPANY INFO Advertising Media Kit  Hitsquad Home Page  Privacy Policy  SMM People  Web Cam  Contact Info

Home | Site Map | News | Search | What's New? | Discussion | Add Listing | Advertising The Musicians Web Center for music resource and industry information on the Net Click here to add Shareware Music Machine to your del.icio.us bookmarks

Copyright © Hitsquad Pty Ltd 1995 - 2008 All rights reserved.